posted by ajgB at Mar 12, 2008 11:57 PM
Quote
Paul,Thank you for your prompt response. Sorry for being too fuzzy.
My intention was and still is to advocate a specific corrective feedback loop to be forged and maintained as a project involving both AM and I2G.
ajgB
posted by paul at Mar 12, 2008 11:17 PM
Quote
Albert,yes, surely Inter2geo will impact this collection and vice-versa.For now, you can shop for existing interactive geometry constructions under an open-license on http://i2geo.net/Traces/ but there is no common format, or common toolset to invoke and render a dynamic geometric construction. That will come but or now you have to use the applet embedding. Do provide or identify a few dynamic geometry constructions for embedding into our collection and I could show the example of embedding.And then there will be more… interactive exercises reporting to AM probably… transfers between text formulę and an interactive geometry construction...What is special in this collection is the set of conceptual topics that are described (and pictured) in an electronic textbook fashion in a way that can be used by learners. The more practice-oriented part of interactive geometry is well in i2geo.paul
posted by ajgB at Mar 12, 2008 9:12 PM
Quote
Why not test and experiment with the current parameters being developed at I2G, and investigate how they (dis)harmonize with the integration of Geometry into AM, in order to establish a corrective feedback loop, hopefully mutually beneficial to both initiatives?ajgB